<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 69105</title>
	<atom:link href="http://69105.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://69105.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 06:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A big free clue for Google by links for 2008-07-05 &#171; Unisyc.</title>
		<link>http://69105.net/2008/07/02/a-big-free-clue-for-google/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-07-05 &#171; Unisyc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69105.net/?p=116#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>[...] 69105 › A big free clue for Google (tags: spam blogs google internet search) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 69105 › A big free clue for Google (tags: spam blogs google internet search) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So what makes YOU happy ? by amos singarella</title>
		<link>http://69105.net/so-what-makes-you-happy/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>amos singarella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/07/27/so-what-makes-you-happy/#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>the smiling eyes of an innocent child!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the smiling eyes of an innocent child!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Invites by Mark</title>
		<link>http://69105.net/2008/05/22/invites/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69105.net/?p=81#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Hi David - getdropbox says you have an account now so it won't send another - sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David - getdropbox says you have an account now so it won&#8217;t send another - sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A big free clue for Google by Root</title>
		<link>http://69105.net/2008/07/02/a-big-free-clue-for-google/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Root</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69105.net/?p=116#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>I am not in any kind of Anti Google rant. They are certainly commercially driven to provide a satisfying end user experience by delivering good search results. Oddly enough I have recently been contemplating how different companies behave when all their users could leave overnight. As opposed to the lock in you get with certain OS vendors. 
But the adsense revenue must be causing a very uncomfortable conflict of interest for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not in any kind of Anti Google rant. They are certainly commercially driven to provide a satisfying end user experience by delivering good search results. Oddly enough I have recently been contemplating how different companies behave when all their users could leave overnight. As opposed to the lock in you get with certain OS vendors.<br />
But the adsense revenue must be causing a very uncomfortable conflict of interest for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A big free clue for Google by Mark</title>
		<link>http://69105.net/2008/07/02/a-big-free-clue-for-google/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69105.net/?p=116#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>Let's take adsense out of the equation. Let's de-personalise it from Google.
These blogs steal from people and they pollute your results. Being in search engines to attract traffic to get the clicks is their entire reason for being.

Throw them out of your index. You do that and your competition will do the same. Win-win.

You can do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s take adsense out of the equation. Let&#8217;s de-personalise it from Google.<br />
These blogs steal from people and they pollute your results. Being in search engines to attract traffic to get the clicks is their entire reason for being.</p>
<p>Throw them out of your index. You do that and your competition will do the same. Win-win.</p>
<p>You can do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Invites by David</title>
		<link>http://69105.net/2008/05/22/invites/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69105.net/?p=81#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>I'd love a dropbox invite!
david@sparcos.net

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love a dropbox invite!<br />
<a href="mailto:david@sparcos.net">david@sparcos.net</a></p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A big free clue for Google by Mark</title>
		<link>http://69105.net/2008/07/02/a-big-free-clue-for-google/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69105.net/?p=116#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>Colm - my point is that I can spot a splog in seconds. Google should be able to code their engines to not just recognise it but also do the other stuff I mentioned.

Root's point is that right now there is adsense on blogs which are stealing content. These are the splogs I can see. Now if on such a splog someone clicks an adsense ad then Google does indeed profit - that's how adsense works. Intention aside this is a fact.

I wrote the above because I'm tired of telling people to click the 'Ads by Gooooogle' and then report abuse. Google has the technology to do this. Google has the ability to send out a clear message that not only does it want to prevent adsense being used this way but that it does care about content theft and that it does want to improve it's own content. How any times do we hear that dupe content is penalised? 

I think Google should not only do more but be seen to be doing more - and in the end everyone actually benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colm - my point is that I can spot a splog in seconds. Google should be able to code their engines to not just recognise it but also do the other stuff I mentioned.</p>
<p>Root&#8217;s point is that right now there is adsense on blogs which are stealing content. These are the splogs I can see. Now if on such a splog someone clicks an adsense ad then Google does indeed profit - that&#8217;s how adsense works. Intention aside this is a fact.</p>
<p>I wrote the above because I&#8217;m tired of telling people to click the &#8216;Ads by Gooooogle&#8217; and then report abuse. Google has the technology to do this. Google has the ability to send out a clear message that not only does it want to prevent adsense being used this way but that it does care about content theft and that it does want to improve it&#8217;s own content. How any times do we hear that dupe content is penalised? </p>
<p>I think Google should not only do more but be seen to be doing more - and in the end everyone actually benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A big free clue for Google by Colm</title>
		<link>http://69105.net/2008/07/02/a-big-free-clue-for-google/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>Colm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69105.net/?p=116#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>[I work for Google, but this shouldn't be taken as representative of the company's position.]

I disagree with Root's comment above; Google would not benefit strategically from systematically encouraging junk or spam in the index - it would be ultimately damaging to people's trust in the brand as providing the best possible results.  Google is known for providing high quality search results and, in a very "unsticky" market like search, the only way Google can stay ahead is by maintaining this reputation.  Relaxing antispam efforts would be a sure path to destruction, and I am absolutely certain that the quality team are aware of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[I work for Google, but this shouldn't be taken as representative of the company's position.]</p>
<p>I disagree with Root&#8217;s comment above; Google would not benefit strategically from systematically encouraging junk or spam in the index - it would be ultimately damaging to people&#8217;s trust in the brand as providing the best possible results.  Google is known for providing high quality search results and, in a very &#8220;unsticky&#8221; market like search, the only way Google can stay ahead is by maintaining this reputation.  Relaxing antispam efforts would be a sure path to destruction, and I am absolutely certain that the quality team are aware of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A big free clue for Google by Root</title>
		<link>http://69105.net/2008/07/02/a-big-free-clue-for-google/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>Root</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69105.net/?p=116#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>You are onto something here Mark. The bottom line is that G and Co profit from content theft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are onto something here Mark. The bottom line is that G and Co profit from content theft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A big free clue for Google by Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://69105.net/2008/07/02/a-big-free-clue-for-google/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69105.net/?p=116#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>Hey, I appreciate the feedback. We do work quite a bit with the Blogger and Blogsearch team to reduce the amount of splogs that would show up, and we've worked to reduce the amount of AdSense spam to not only kick spammers out of our index but out of AdSense as well.

I'd love to hear more about where you run across splogs these days: surfing, searching on blogsearch, doing link: searches on blogsearch, searching on the main Google index, etc. Any examples are welcome, and feel free to email me any time you see splogs and that will be a good independent sample--I'd be happy to hear any time you notice junk like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I appreciate the feedback. We do work quite a bit with the Blogger and Blogsearch team to reduce the amount of splogs that would show up, and we&#8217;ve worked to reduce the amount of AdSense spam to not only kick spammers out of our index but out of AdSense as well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear more about where you run across splogs these days: surfing, searching on blogsearch, doing link: searches on blogsearch, searching on the main Google index, etc. Any examples are welcome, and feel free to email me any time you see splogs and that will be a good independent sample&#8211;I&#8217;d be happy to hear any time you notice junk like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
